What the heck is a “process” anyway?

So I went to the Town Hall Meeting this evening at Davis in Freeborn Hall.  The livestream is here if you’re interested in seeing a good chunk of it.  And while I won’t summarize what happened, I think it’s worth sharing an interesting contrast I kept noticing repeatedly, as students got up to ask questions, and the panelists (Chancellor Katehi, Provost Hexter, VC Fred Wood, and a representative from the UCPD) attempted to answer.  Here is the basic gist of it, with some version of this same exchange happening over, and over, and over again.

Panel:  We all feel terrible about what happened.

Student(s):  We want action/transparency.  What are your concrete plans for change/justice?

Panel:  There is a process already in place/there is an independent investigation.  This is all being reviewed.  Our findings will be made public, and we will keep the lines of communication open as we move forward.

Student(s):  That’s ridiculous administrator-speak.  You have so blatantly failed us that we can’t possibly believe your “findings,” because we don’t trust your “process.”  The only way we will trust your process is if you actually involve us in it, and if you let us shape the process, so that it becomes our process too.

Except that nobody actually said that last part.  There were all sorts of expressions of dissatisfaction from the audience with various lukewarm answers by the panel, but nobody actually pointed out the big elephant in the room:  that the top-down, top-secret, and independent ideas of process held by the panelists are clearly in direct opposition to the students’ bottom-up, grassroots, and inclusive ideas of process.

This seems like a pretty big impasse.  As my grandma would have said, “That’s a head-scratcher!”  I wish someone had asked a question about this obvious disconnect and how to handle it.  I would have liked to hear the answer to that one.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to What the heck is a “process” anyway?

  1. Chris says:

    Is there really any hope that students and administrators can bridge the ultimate divide? I mean even if every police officer is fired, will the students be satisfied if their tuition goes up another 20% a year? Facing the costs that she does & the lack of state financing can Katehi really restrict tuition hikes much? What’s the realistic middle ground here?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s